Your site through the eyes of AI
People increasingly ask an assistant instead of a search engine: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and the rest. The assistant reads a few sites and names two or three. This check shows what it sees on yours, whether you make that list, and what stands in the way.
Half a minute · no signup · nothing to install · result on screen
- Ten pages, not one. Other tools read a single page and call it a site check.
- We name the pages to fix. Not "your content is hard to quote", but a list of addresses.
This is what the answer looks like: our own site, measured by the same code on 2026-09-19. The score is the sum of five areas; add them up by hand and you get exactly this number. Below it the check lists which of the 14 AI crawlers a site lets in and which it turns away.
What one run covers
What the free check gets through
One run, under two seconds, nothing to install.
- 14 AI crawlers checked by name: whether your robots.txt lets them in or turns them away
- 10 pages of the site read in full, not just the homepage
- 5 engines get their own readiness score: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot
- 5 areas add up to a score out of 100, and you can add them up by hand
- 6 SEO basics in the same report: titles, descriptions, H1, canonical
- 3 fixes naming what to close first
measurements in one run
- 60
- SEO checks: 6 rules on each of 10 pages
- 80
- content signals: 8 on every page
- 14
- AI crawlers against your robots.txt
- 5
- checks on the site as a whole
Every number here was measured by our own code on our own site. Run yours and count again.
Why people run it
One check, three different reasons
Why does the assistant name someone else
The site is alive and the copy is good, yet you are not in the AI answers. Usually it is not the copy but three files a robot looks for and cannot find. The check names them.
Who gets named instead of you, and why
Run a rival through the same tool and compare the five areas side by side. You see exactly where they are ahead, and it is a measurement of their site, not a guess.
For a marketer: a reason to start the conversation
Check a client's site before the meeting. Come not with "let's do promotion" but with specifics: this is closed, this is missing, this is what it costs.
How it works
We read your site the way an AI crawler reads it
- We knock the way an assistant knocks
We see whether the site lets in the 14 crawlers that fetch pages for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Copilot answers. One line in robots.txt can close you to all of them at once.
- We look for the map for agents
llms.txt is a short list of your pages written for a machine. Most sites we have checked do not have one.
- We check whether it is clear who you are
Structured data should name what you actually do. A dental clinic should be marked as a dental clinic, not as "an organisation".
- We look for something to quote
An assistant takes a short, ready answer from the first paragraph. If the page opens with the company history, there is nothing to quote.
- We check whether you can be trusted
Dates, authorship, sources under the figures. A figure without a source is not a fact to a machine.
What makes it different
We only say what we measured
The score can be checked by hand. Five areas add up to exactly the number at the top. No weight taken from thin air.
Could not measure, we say so. If a file could not be read, the area is marked "not measured" and counts neither for nor against. A zero would claim you are doing badly, and we do not know that.
No "our AI thinks". Every finding is a specific file, a line, or its absence. Open it and see for yourself.
This work has names. GEO, generative engine optimization, and AEO, answer engine optimization. We measure the things behind the names rather than the names: the files, the markup and the text. What it is and what decides it.
And we measure ourselves with the same tool. This site scores 88 of 100 as of 2026-09-19. Same code, same settings, and the number is refreshed every time the site is built.
After the check
First you get the result. Then you decide whether you need more
- The score and five areas, on screen
No email, no signup. That already answers whether AI sees you.
- The first fix, in full
The most important one: what is there now, what to change, how to check it worked. On screen, and by email if you leave one, so you can hand it to whoever runs the site.
- More only if you want it
Every fix across the whole site, a comparison with rivals, a review by a person. We write about that in the same email, and the prices are there, not here. See what there is.
Why trust us
We built this for ourselves, then gave it to people
Fifteen sites of our own, more than two million words, 9 modules around one hub. The tool grew out of what we fixed on our own sites every day.
Single control point for every inbound lead. All modules read and write here. No lead lost between chat, site, CRM, and reports.
Programmatic SEO site factory: area guides, FAQs, investment content. Indexed for Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity.
Qualifies inbound leads on WhatsApp, Telegram, web chat. Budget, timeline, intent. Routes hot leads to the right person.
Automates deal stages, tags, assignments, follow-ups. Human stays in control on high-value steps.
Captures call context, summaries, next steps. Surfaces gaps in scripts and follow-up.
Live dashboards: organic, conversions, leads by source and broker. One screen for decisions.
SEO articles, guides, landing copy. Agent draft, rules, validation, human approval before publish.
Site publishes once. Telegram, LinkedIn, X pull from the same source. No duplicate manual work.
Curated AI and industry news with commentary. Auto digest to site and social. Shorts when video is ready.
AI onboarding and training for new hires and ongoing enablement. Company intro, team, scripts, quizzes. Progress synced to CRM before live leads are assigned.
Need the system rather than the tool? See the services.
The check takes half a minute
Knowing whether AI sees you costs less than not knowing.